Between / Scenes
Scene 06 · Jan 31, 2026 · 3 min read

The gray goo of content

Marketing did not become hollow because people stopped trying. It became hollow because it became self-replicating.

There’s a science-fiction concept called gray goo.

It comes from the work of Eric Drexler, who used it in the 1980s as a thought experiment about self-replicating nanotechnology. The idea was not about evil machines. It was about systems that reproduce without restraint. Tiny units consume matter, replicate themselves, and keep going, not because they are malicious, but because nothing stops them.

Eventually, the world is not destroyed.

It is homogenized.

That is what most marketing content looks like right now.

Marketing did not become hollow because people stopped trying.

It became hollow because it became self-replicating.

The same frameworks.

The same hooks.

The same “best practices.”

The same formats optimized for the same platforms chasing the same shallow signals.

Content is not created anymore.

It is copied, resized, reposted, and reskinned until the original insight, if there ever was one, disappears.

AI did not start this.

AI just made it faster.

The sludge was already there.

Gray goo is not chaos.

That is the part people miss.

It is orderly.

Efficient.

Defensible.

Every piece looks correct.

Every caption follows the rules.

Every video hits the same beats at the same timestamps.

Every post survives a meeting.

And none of it says anything.

This is what happens when marketing stops observing the world and starts observing itself.

Most strategies you see today are not strategies.

They are echoes.

Someone runs a campaign that works.

Someone screenshots it.

Someone turns it into a PDF.

Someone sells the PDF.

Agencies deploy it at scale.

AI trains on the output.

Everyone copies the AI.

Insight never enters the loop.

This is where the metaphor quietly crosses disciplines.

Years later, writers and technologists started using gray goo to describe digital culture itself, not as a hardware problem, but as a meaning problem. In You Are Not a Gadget, Jaron Lanier described how systems that reward replication over judgment slowly flatten culture. Authorship erodes. Context disappears. Output increases while meaning collapses.

Different substrate.

Same failure mode.

The problem is not repetition.

Repetition has always existed.

The problem is replication without digestion.

No one is asking:

Why did this work?

What tension did it touch?

What fear did it relieve?

What desire did it validate?

They are just asking:

Where do I paste this?

How fast can I ship it?

Will it get approved?

Gray goo does not ask questions.

It consumes and multiplies.

Marketing used to be about attention in context.

Now it is about output without interpretation.

Everyone has access to the same tools.

The same platforms.

The same dashboards.

The same production pipelines.

So differentiation did not disappear.

Thinking did.

When everyone uses the same lenses, everything looks the same.

This is why feeds feel heavy.

Not loud.

Heavy.

Like moving through something viscous that absorbs effort without reflecting anything back.

People are not disengaged because they are bored.

They are disengaged because nothing acknowledges them as conscious participants.

Gray goo does not speak to anyone.

It only exists around them.

Calling this a metaphor is not cute.

It is diagnostic.

Self-replicating systems always feel productive right before they collapse.

They generate volume.

They reward compliance.

They punish deviation.

And then they plateau, because there is nothing left to consume but themselves.

The antidote is not originality for its own sake.

It is observation.

Real observation.

Of people.

Of pressure.

Of contradiction.

Of exhaustion.

Of humor.

Of resentment.

Of relief.

Things that do not show up in dashboards.

Gray goo cannot do that.

It has no nervous system.

Humans do.

Which is slower.

Riskier.

And still the only thing that actually works.

Most content does not fail because it is bad.

It fails because it is indistinguishable.

And indistinguishable things do not get rejected.

They just get ignored.

Quietly.

Fin.

References

Drexler, K. E. (1986). Engines of creation: The coming era of nanotechnology. Anchor Press/Doubleday. Introduced the “gray goo” thought experiment as a systems-failure scenario involving unchecked self-replication.

Lanier, J. (2010). You are not a gadget: A manifesto. Alfred A. Knopf. Applied the gray goo metaphor to digital culture, critiquing how automated systems reward replication over judgment and flatten meaning.